http //www.reliablemedpharmacy.com/
Sandbox / sfa
[ Edit ]
Back to Snip <-- Previous Change | Next Change -->
| Diff Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title | That's a fantastic p | That's a fantastic p | |||
| Date | 2015-02-21 11:01:47 | 2015-02-21 14:38:50 | |||
| Editor | Anonymous | Anonymous | |||
| Edit | Edit this version | Edit this version | |||
| Tags | |||||
| 2015-02-21 11:01:47 by Anonymous / Edit this version | 2015-02-21 14:38:50 by Anonymous / Edit this version | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | 1 | That's a fantastic post Adam.First of all,<a href= | t | 1 | That's a fantastic post Adam.First of all, byinug |
| > | "http://ufluphbfvq.com"> biyung</a> a share does | > | a share does not equal byinug a club.Second, Sev | ||
| > | not equal<a href="http://ufluphbfvq.com"> biyung< | > | co did not get the SPL share, Dundee did. (Does th | ||
| > | /a> a club.Second, Sevco did not get the SPL share | > | at mean Dundee can claim Rangers SPL history btw?) | ||
| > | , Dundee did. (Does that mean Dundee can claim Ran | > | Third, when Sevco get SFA membership it was transf | ||
| > | gers SPL history btw?)Third, when Sevco get SFA me | > | erred from Rangers to Sevco. This means that Range | ||
| > | mbership it was transferred from Rangers to Sevco. | > | rs were no longer members but Sevco were now the n | ||
| > | This means that Rangers were no longer members bu | > | ew members. The membership was trasnferred specifi | ||
| > | t Sevco were now the new members. The membership w | > | cally to ensure Sevco would not have to wait 3 yea | ||
| > | as trasnferred specifically to ensure Sevco would | > | rs in order to play football.But getting SFA membe | ||
| > | not have to wait 3 years in order to play football | > | rship does not mean anything other than belng perm | ||
| > | .But getting SFA membership does not mean anything | > | itted to become a member. You want (and hope and p | ||
| > | other than belng permitted to become a member. Yo | > | ray) that it means that if Sevco get this membersh | ||
| > | u want (and hope and pray) that it means that if S | > | ip then they can claim all past glories of Rangers | ||
| > | evco get this membership then they can claim all p | > | .If the club remained intact, if it didn't go bust | ||
| > | ast glories of Rangers.If the club remained intact | > | , if it didn't go into liquidation, then it would | ||
| > | , if it didn't go bust, if it didn't go into liqui | > | still be a member of the Scottish Football Associa | ||
| > | dation, then it would still be a member of the Sco | > | tion there would be no need for membership trans | ||
| > | ttish Football Association there would be no nee | > | fer would there?The company that owned & operated | ||
| > | d for membership transfer would there?The company | > | Rangers was Wavetower previous it was MIH. Compa | ||
| > | that owned & operated Rangers was Wavetower prev | > | nies that own clubs come and go all the time in fo | ||
| > | ious it was MIH. Companies that own clubs come and | > | otball but a club keeps its football membership. W | ||
| > | go all the time in football but a club keeps its | > | as there a membership transfer when Craig Whyte bo | ||
| > | football membership. Was there a membership transf | > | ught the club from David Murray? No.What's differe | ||
| > | er when Craig Whyte bought the club from David Mur | > | nt this time around?Q. Why would a club that is cu | ||
| > | ray? No.What's different this time around?Q. Why w | > | rrently a member need to transfer membership in th | ||
| > | ould a club that is currently a member need to tra | > | e first place?A. Rangers, who were heading into li | ||
| > | nsfer membership in the first place?A. Rangers, wh | > | quidation after the CVA failed, transferred their | ||
| > | o were heading into liquidation after the CVA fail | > | membership to Sevco. This meant that Rangers were | ||
| > | ed, transferred their membership to Sevco. This me | > | no longer members, but Sevco were now the new memb | ||
| > | ant that Rangers were no longer members, but Sevco | > | ers. Sevco then changed it's name to The Rangers.O | ||
| > | were now the new members. Sevco then changed it's | > | nly the blind or the deep in denial cannot see the | ||
| > | name to The Rangers.Only the blind or the deep in | > | reality here. Rangers FC owes millions to credito | ||
| > | denial cannot see the reality here. Rangers FC ow | > | rs and the taxpayer. That's without the big tax ca | ||
| > | es millions to creditors and the taxpayer. That's | > | se. If HMRC appeal and win, this debt is considera | ||
| > | without the big tax case. If HMRC appeal and win, | > | bly higher. Which is why the article written by An | ||
| > | this debt is considerably higher. Which is why the | > | gela is correct and why this argument will never g | ||
| > | article written by Angela is correct and why this | > | o away. | ||
| > | argument will never go away. | ||||
