http //www.reliablemedpharmacy.com/
Sandbox / sfa
[ Edit ]
Back to Snip <-- Previous Change | Next Change -->
| Diff Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title | Hello there, just be | That's a fantastic p | |||
| Date | 2015-02-21 04:43:27 | 2015-02-21 11:01:47 | |||
| Editor | Anonymous | Anonymous | |||
| Edit | Edit this version | Edit this version | |||
| Tags | |||||
| 2015-02-21 04:43:27 by Anonymous / Edit this version | 2015-02-21 11:01:47 by Anonymous / Edit this version | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | 1 | Hello there, just became alert to your blog tuorhg | t | 1 | That's a fantastic post Adam.First of all,<a href= |
| > | h Google, and found that it's truly informative. I | > | "http://ufluphbfvq.com"> biyung</a> a share does | ||
| > | ’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will be gratefu | > | not equal<a href="http://ufluphbfvq.com"> biyung< | ||
| > | l if you continue this in future. Many people will | > | /a> a club.Second, Sevco did not get the SPL share | ||
| > | be benefited from your writing. Cheers! http://gv | > | , Dundee did. (Does that mean Dundee can claim Ran | ||
| > | tjvrkcum.com [url=http://ucccelk.com]ucccelk[/url] | > | gers SPL history btw?)Third, when Sevco get SFA me | ||
| > | [link=http://secfrxp.com]secfrxp[/link] | > | mbership it was transferred from Rangers to Sevco. | ||
| > | This means that Rangers were no longer members bu | ||||
| > | t Sevco were now the new members. The membership w | ||||
| > | as trasnferred specifically to ensure Sevco would | ||||
| > | not have to wait 3 years in order to play football | ||||
| > | .But getting SFA membership does not mean anything | ||||
| > | other than belng permitted to become a member. Yo | ||||
| > | u want (and hope and pray) that it means that if S | ||||
| > | evco get this membership then they can claim all p | ||||
| > | ast glories of Rangers.If the club remained intact | ||||
| > | , if it didn't go bust, if it didn't go into liqui | ||||
| > | dation, then it would still be a member of the Sco | ||||
| > | ttish Football Association there would be no nee | ||||
| > | d for membership transfer would there?The company | ||||
| > | that owned & operated Rangers was Wavetower prev | ||||
| > | ious it was MIH. Companies that own clubs come and | ||||
| > | go all the time in football but a club keeps its | ||||
| > | football membership. Was there a membership transf | ||||
| > | er when Craig Whyte bought the club from David Mur | ||||
| > | ray? No.What's different this time around?Q. Why w | ||||
| > | ould a club that is currently a member need to tra | ||||
| > | nsfer membership in the first place?A. Rangers, wh | ||||
| > | o were heading into liquidation after the CVA fail | ||||
| > | ed, transferred their membership to Sevco. This me | ||||
| > | ant that Rangers were no longer members, but Sevco | ||||
| > | were now the new members. Sevco then changed it's | ||||
| > | name to The Rangers.Only the blind or the deep in | ||||
| > | denial cannot see the reality here. Rangers FC ow | ||||
| > | es millions to creditors and the taxpayer. That's | ||||
| > | without the big tax case. If HMRC appeal and win, | ||||
| > | this debt is considerably higher. Which is why the | ||||
| > | article written by Angela is correct and why this | ||||
| > | argument will never go away. | ||||
