http //www.reliablemedpharmacy.com/
Sandbox / sfa
[ Edit ]
Back to Snip <-- Previous Change | Next Change -->
| Diff Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title | The club live on, it | Home insurance <a hr | |||
| Date | 2014-02-19 03:52:28 | 2014-02-19 04:32:39 | |||
| Editor | Anonymous | Anonymous | |||
| Edit | Edit this version | Edit this version | |||
| Tags | |||||
| 2014-02-19 03:52:28 by Anonymous / Edit this version | 2014-02-19 04:32:39 by Anonymous / Edit this version | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | 1 | The club live on, it has only been transferred or | t | 1 | Home insurance <a href="http://playsse.com">poclii |
| > | sold to a new conmpay after the old one went bust. | > | es</a> are pretty standard, the only variables wil | ||
| > | Really? OK, I remember the club being sold before | > | l be deductibles, contents, outside storage, etc. | ||
| > | , from John Lawrence's organisation to David Murra | > | One thing to keep in mind if you live near the co | ||
| > | y's, then from David Murray's to Craig Whyte. Stra | > | ast is that ins. <a href="http://playsse.com">pocl | ||
| > | ngely, I don't remember in any of these occasions, | > | iies</a> do not cover water damage unless driven b | ||
| > | when the club was definitely sold as a whole enti | > | y wind. Therefore, if a hurricane blows your hous | ||
| > | ty, debts included, that it, the club, had to reap | > | e down, you are covered (there are always exceptio | ||
| > | ply for a position in the SPL or equivalent league | > | ns), but if there is damage from storm surge or fl | ||
| > | , or for SFA membership and yet, this time, purp | > | ooding, it is not covered unless you also have flo | ||
| > | ortedly it has simply been sold to Charles Greens | > | od insurance. | ||
| > | consortium, but has to go through all these applic | ||||
| > | ations. Why? Something different this time, right? | ||||
| > | The club and conmpay are separate, its the conmpay | ||||
| > | in liquidation, not the club. But hold on did t | ||||
| > | he conmpay get docked the sporting points sanction | ||||
| > | for going into administration, or the club? Ah, r | ||||
| > | ight, it was the club but what for? If the club | ||||
| > | and the conmpay are/were separate, why did the clu | ||||
| > | b get punished with sanctions? I mean the club did | ||||
| > | n't run up any debts did they, it was the parent c | ||||
| > | onmpay, right? After all, that administration has | ||||
| > | led to liquidation of whatever entity was in admin | ||||
| > | istration. So if the conmpay only is being liquida | ||||
| > | ted, it must have been the conmpay that was in adm | ||||
| > | in not the club? Yet the club were docked 10 poi | ||||
| > | nts. So, how did the parent conmpay, as is now per | ||||
| > | petuated in the media, get itself into this situat | ||||
| > | ion where it ran up massive debts, couldn't pay th | ||||
| > | em, and got itself liquidated. What was it buying | ||||
| > | to run up such massive debts? What did it own, wha | ||||
| > | t assets did it pay for? Players, perhaps? Players | ||||
| > | which played for and were registered with ..what | ||||
| > | entityave Rangers been playing for years with loan | ||||
| > | s from its parent conmpay (now almost departed)?It | ||||
| > | s certainly a sound argument, that the club has be | ||||
| > | en simply sold on to new owners. In fact since it | ||||
| > | is the parent conmpay which is in trouble, the clu | ||||
| > | b was never ever in trouble at any time in the las | ||||
| > | t few years there was no risk whatsoever, was th | ||||
| > | ere? Why all the fuss? Why did the assets have to | ||||
| > | be bought?And as for those assets, one is the hist | ||||
| > | ory, right? History can be bought and sold as an a | ||||
| > | sset, can't it?So why didn't Charles Green buy the | ||||
| > | stadium, the players, etc but offer Nottingham | ||||
| > | Forest a few million for THEIR history to be attac | ||||
| > | hed so that this club he was piecing together co | ||||
| > | uld have two European Cups in their history? I mea | ||||
| > | n, its not ridiculous is it? History can be bought | ||||
| > | and sold as an asset after all.I MEAN, IT'S NOT R | ||||
| > | IDICULOUS, IS IT????? Then again . | ||||
