http //www.reliablemedpharmacy.com/
Sandbox / sfa
[ Edit ]
Back to Snip <-- Previous Change | Next Change -->
| Diff Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title | One other thing I wo | The club live on, it | |||
| Date | 2014-02-19 02:41:38 | 2014-02-19 03:52:28 | |||
| Editor | Anonymous | Anonymous | |||
| Edit | Edit this version | Edit this version | |||
| Tags | |||||
| 2014-02-19 02:41:38 by Anonymous / Edit this version | 2014-02-19 03:52:28 by Anonymous / Edit this version | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | 1 | One other thing I would like to mention is that in | t | 1 | The club live on, it has only been transferred or |
| > | place of tyirng to match all your online degree t | > | sold to a new conmpay after the old one went bust. | ||
| > | raining on days of the week that you finish off wo | > | Really? OK, I remember the club being sold before | ||
| > | rk (since most people are fatigued when they get b | > | , from John Lawrence's organisation to David Murra | ||
| > | ack), try to have most of your instructional class | > | y's, then from David Murray's to Craig Whyte. Stra | ||
| > | es on the saturdays and sundays and only a couple | > | ngely, I don't remember in any of these occasions, | ||
| > | courses in weekdays, even if it means a little tim | > | when the club was definitely sold as a whole enti | ||
| > | e away from your weekend. This is beneficial becau | > | ty, debts included, that it, the club, had to reap | ||
| > | se on the weekends, you will be a lot more rested | > | ply for a position in the SPL or equivalent league | ||
| > | in addition to concentrated in school work. Thanks | > | , or for SFA membership and yet, this time, purp | ||
| > | for the different suggestions I have realized fro | > | ortedly it has simply been sold to Charles Greens | ||
| > | m your site. | > | consortium, but has to go through all these applic | ||
| > | ations. Why? Something different this time, right? | ||||
| > | The club and conmpay are separate, its the conmpay | ||||
| > | in liquidation, not the club. But hold on did t | ||||
| > | he conmpay get docked the sporting points sanction | ||||
| > | for going into administration, or the club? Ah, r | ||||
| > | ight, it was the club but what for? If the club | ||||
| > | and the conmpay are/were separate, why did the clu | ||||
| > | b get punished with sanctions? I mean the club did | ||||
| > | n't run up any debts did they, it was the parent c | ||||
| > | onmpay, right? After all, that administration has | ||||
| > | led to liquidation of whatever entity was in admin | ||||
| > | istration. So if the conmpay only is being liquida | ||||
| > | ted, it must have been the conmpay that was in adm | ||||
| > | in not the club? Yet the club were docked 10 poi | ||||
| > | nts. So, how did the parent conmpay, as is now per | ||||
| > | petuated in the media, get itself into this situat | ||||
| > | ion where it ran up massive debts, couldn't pay th | ||||
| > | em, and got itself liquidated. What was it buying | ||||
| > | to run up such massive debts? What did it own, wha | ||||
| > | t assets did it pay for? Players, perhaps? Players | ||||
| > | which played for and were registered with ..what | ||||
| > | entityave Rangers been playing for years with loan | ||||
| > | s from its parent conmpay (now almost departed)?It | ||||
| > | s certainly a sound argument, that the club has be | ||||
| > | en simply sold on to new owners. In fact since it | ||||
| > | is the parent conmpay which is in trouble, the clu | ||||
| > | b was never ever in trouble at any time in the las | ||||
| > | t few years there was no risk whatsoever, was th | ||||
| > | ere? Why all the fuss? Why did the assets have to | ||||
| > | be bought?And as for those assets, one is the hist | ||||
| > | ory, right? History can be bought and sold as an a | ||||
| > | sset, can't it?So why didn't Charles Green buy the | ||||
| > | stadium, the players, etc but offer Nottingham | ||||
| > | Forest a few million for THEIR history to be attac | ||||
| > | hed so that this club he was piecing together co | ||||
| > | uld have two European Cups in their history? I mea | ||||
| > | n, its not ridiculous is it? History can be bought | ||||
| > | and sold as an asset after all.I MEAN, IT'S NOT R | ||||
| > | IDICULOUS, IS IT????? Then again . | ||||
