http //www.reliablemedpharmacy.com/
Sandbox / sfa
[ Edit ]
Back to Snip <-- Previous Change | Next Change -->
| Diff Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title | The club live on, it | A magnificent <a hre | |||
| Date | 2015-02-20 01:51:22 | 2015-02-20 02:10:40 | |||
| Editor | Anonymous | Anonymous | |||
| Edit | Edit this version | Edit this version | |||
| Tags | |||||
| 2015-02-20 01:51:22 by Anonymous / Edit this version | 2015-02-20 02:10:40 by Anonymous / Edit this version | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | 1 | The club live on, it has only been transferred or | t | 1 | A magnificent <a href="http://vxtczl.com">arcilte< |
| > | sold to a new<a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaom | > | /a>, Angela.What fascinates me most about the ongo | ||
| > | y</a> after the old one went bust. Really? OK, I r | > | ing Rangers/Sevco scandal is that it is a microcos | ||
| > | emember the club being sold before, from John Lawr | > | m of a corrupt society. The Scottish media has ben | ||
| > | ence's organisation to David Murray's, then from D | > | t over backwards to endorse the notion that a zomb | ||
| > | avid Murray's to Craig Whyte. Strangely, I don't r | > | ie club doing a semi-credible impersonation of the | ||
| > | emember in any of these occasions, when the club w | > | defunct Rangers is sufficient reason to pretend t | ||
| > | as definitely sold as a whole entity, debts includ | > | hat nothing serious really happened.Everything is | ||
| > | ed, that it, the club, had to reapply for a positi | > | supposed to be more or less okay apart from the un | ||
| > | on in the SPL or equivalent league, or for SFA mem | > | fortunate temporary displacement of Sevco-Masquera | ||
| > | bership and yet, this time, purportedly it has s | > | ding-As-Rangers from the pinnacle of Scottish foot | ||
| > | imply been sold to Charles Greens consortium, but | > | ball.Compare the media's relentless campaign again | ||
| > | has to go through all these applications. Why? Som | > | st Neil Lennon when he was the innocent victim of | ||
| > | ething different this time, right?The club and<a h | > | a calculated deception by the former referee and d | ||
| > | ref="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaomy</a> are separat | > | iscredited liar, Dougie McDonald. McDonald's boss, | ||
| > | e, its the<a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaomy</ | > | Hugh Dallas, tried to continue the cover-up and s | ||
| > | a> in liquidation, not the club. But hold on did | > | ustain the lies. When Dallas came under pressure a | ||
| > | the<a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaomy</a> get | > | fter shooting himself in the foot by sending secta | ||
| > | docked the sporting points sanction for going int | > | rian emails through the SFA's internal mail system | ||
| > | o administration, or the club? Ah, right, it was t | > | , the entire body of Scottish Grade One referees r | ||
| > | he club but what for? If the club and the<a href | > | allied to his aid by going on strike. The Scottish | ||
| > | ="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaomy</a> are/were separ | > | media could not do enough to help them. When matc | ||
| > | ate, why did the club get punished with sanctions? | > | h officials were called in from abroad to enable t | ||
| > | I mean the club didn't run up any debts did they, | > | he scheduled fixtures to go ahead, Chick Young ava | ||
| > | it was the parent<a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> c | > | iled himself of the BBC's resources to phone a ref | ||
| > | pnaomy</a>, right? After all, that administration | > | eree in Israel and present him with a wildly imbal | ||
| > | has led to liquidation of whatever entity was in a | > | anced misrepresentation of the reasons for the str | ||
| > | dministration. So if the<a href="http://yipdfcsf.c | > | ike. The same Chick Young then sped to Glasgow Air | ||
| > | om"> cpnaomy</a> only is being liquidated, it must | > | port to intercept another referee and persuade him | ||
| > | have been the<a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnao | > | to go back home.Former referees Kenny Young and S | ||
| > | my</a> that was in admin not the club? Yet the c | > | tuart Lovell appeared to have unlimited access to | ||
| > | lub were docked 10 points. So, how did the parent< | > | the airwaves of all the major broadcasters while s | ||
| > | a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaomy</a>, as is n | > | imultaneously having the sympathetic ear of every | ||
| > | ow perpetuated in the media, get itself into this | > | Rangers-friendly hack in the press.All of this ene | ||
| > | situation where it ran up massive debts, couldn't | > | rgy was expended in order to put Neil Lennon and C | ||
| > | pay them, and got itself liquidated. What was it b | > | eltic on the back foot despite the fact of the ove | ||
| > | uying to run up such massive debts? What did it ow | > | rwhelming evidence that they had been lied to by t | ||
| > | n, what assets did it pay for? Players, perhaps? P | > | he game's leading officials on the matter of a rel | ||
| > | layers which played for and were registered with . | > | atively minor refereeing blunder.This particular e | ||
| > | .what entityave Rangers been playing for years wit | > | pisode highlights as well as any other the proof t | ||
| > | h loans from its parent<a href="http://yipdfcsf.co | > | hat the Scottish media wilfully ignore the facts a | ||
| > | m"> cpnaomy</a> (now almost departed)?Its certainl | > | nd peddle outright lies in a sustained campaign to | ||
| > | y a sound argument, that the club has been simply | > | defend the interests of a corrupt system which ha | ||
| > | sold on to new owners. In fact since it is the par | > | s always taken it as read that whatever else hap | ||
| > | ent<a href="http://yipdfcsf.com"> cpnaomy</a> whic | > | pens Rangers must always be guaranteed a positio | ||
| > | h is in trouble, the club was never ever in troubl | > | n of dominance in the Scottish game.That preposter | ||
| > | e at any time in the last few years there was no | > | ous and outrageous premise is still close to the c | ||
| > | risk whatsoever, was there? Why all the fuss? Why | > | entre of the Establishment agenda in Scotland and | ||
| > | did the assets have to be bought?And as for those | > | that is why the ludicrous idea that a dead club st | ||
| > | assets, one is the history, right? History can be | > | ill exists is being promulgated with such fanatica | ||
| > | bought and sold as an asset, can't it?So why didn | > | l determination by the poodle media.Rangers are de | ||
| > | 't Charles Green buy the stadium, the players, etc | > | ad.Sevco are trying to step into the vacuum.No hon | ||
| > | but offer Nottingham Forest a few million for T | > | est, honourable person is going to lie down and al | ||
| > | HEIR history to be attached so that this club he | > | low them to do that.Keep up the good work. | ||
| > | was piecing together could have two European Cups | ||||
| > | in their history? I mean, its not ridiculous is i | ||||
| > | t? History can be bought and sold as an asset afte | ||||
| > | r all.I MEAN, IT'S NOT RIDICULOUS, IS IT????? Then | ||||
| > | again . | ||||
